Comments on: Miley Cyrus Addresses Gay Marriage and Religion

By: Cyberia

Cyberia — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:54:37 +0000

wow miley dreamer, making ridiculous statements with nothing to back it up; how the hell do you know that? been gay before? – go get a freaking lobotomy already – it might actually help you.

By: miley dreamer

miley dreamer — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:50:33 +0000

no one is naturally gay… its just cause of our bad thinking of our bad mind…. so get over these things…. i am waiting when u people make out with donkeys…. haha
btw miley is baby, i l*v* her so much, she say it bcoz she dont know it and she is just baby mind.. she is most amazing thing an whole world…

By: Cara Harrington

Cara Harrington — Tue, 05 May 2009 13:42:24 +0000

Bill, I understand everyone has the rights to their own opinions, but based on your logic that:

“However, there is NOTHING that stops gays from getting married–as long as it is between a man and a woman.”

I am pretty sure you are confused on what “gay” means. If you are say….a gay man then you’d be in love with and want to marry another man. Two people of the opposite sex would be straight. And also your comment….

“Marriage is a license from the state. Marriage is not a right.”

No. It’s a right. Everyone has a right to apply for that license and be given said license regardless of the creed, color or gender.

Besides…isn’t there something in that Bible you are thumping about judging others and loving everyone despite their sins? To me sir…you are a hypocrite. You can’t pick and choose which parts of the Bible suit you best. If you’re going to preach and judge at least do it under the correct “teachings”. Or stop hiding behind a religion.

By: Bill

Bill — Tue, 05 May 2009 09:02:34 +0000

Men and women are different. They contribute different things to a child. Societies all over the planet, for thousands of years, have understood this. It was understood that from the child’s standpoint, all things being equal, it is better to have a mother and a father than two fathers or two mothers.

Societies therefore created the concept of “marriage” to encourage men and women to join together for the sake of children. *This has nothing to do with love.* It has to do with what is best for the child. Of course, love is an added benefit, but it *was not and is not the basis of the reason for marriage.*

Marriage is a license from the state. Marriage is not a right. It is a definition. A driver’s license is a license from the state. It is not a right. The state says minors can’t marry; siblings can’t marry; multiple partners can’t marry, and same sex partners can’t marry. Marriage is discriminatory.

However, there is NOTHING that stops gays from getting married–as long as it is between a man and a woman.

So, marriage was based on being between man and a women. But now people want to define it on the basis of love–alone. Well, the consequence of this is that there is *no way* to say three people who love each other can’t get married. Nor can anyone stop siblings who love each other from being married. You may not like the idea of siblings being married. But once love becomes the criteria, you will have no legal way to stop it.

Those who are fighting to keep marriage defined as it has been for all history understand this.